Example Survey and Program-Level Dashboard

PhD Exit Survey

Section 1: Funding & Outside Work

Institutional support includes fellowships, grants, Teaching Assistantships, Research Assistantships, Staff Assistantships, etc. from WSU

Please indicate how many years you relied on each non-institutional funding source:

Non-Institutional Funding SourceYears Supported
Student Loans
Personal/Family Financial Support
Outside Employment
Other Financial Sources:

Section 2: Publications during your graduate program

If applicable to your field, please indicate the number of journal articles where you were an author during your entire graduate career at WSU. If you did not submit or publish a journal article, please add zero to the table below:

Type of Journal ArticlePublishedUnder Review
Peer-reviewed
Non-peer-reviewed

If applicable to your field, please indicate the number of each type of scholarly presentation or activity (other than journal articles) during your graduate career at WSU:

Contribution TypeNumber
Conference or stakeholder presentations
Poster presentations
Book chapters / creative works
Juried exhibitions / artistic contributions
Grants / fellowships awarded
Awards / honors received
Patents filed
Patents in progress / under review

Section 3: Career Development

Please indicate your participation in the following:

ActivityYesNo
Through my graduate program
Through GPSA/PDI (Graduate and Professional Student Association / Professional Development Initiative)
Through other WSU-wide resources (e.g., Career Services, Writing Center)
Through a Conference or Professional Organization
Other

Section 4: Program Satisfaction

Please rate your level of agreement with each statement: (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, NA = Not Applicable)

Statement12345NA
I was able to take coursework that aligned with my research interests.
The courses I took were useful in helping me prepare for my dissertation.
The quality of instruction in my courses was of high caliber.
The feedback I received on my qualifying (cumulative) exam was helpful.
The feedback I received on my preliminary exam was helpful.
During the dissertation (ABD) stage, my committee provided helpful support and mentoring.

Please rate your level of agreement with each statement: (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, NA = Not Applicable)

Statement12345
I received high-quality career/professional development advising.
I received effective training in pedagogical methods (creating learning outcomes, designing assessments, actionable feedback).

Please rate your level of agreement with each statement: (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, NA = Not Applicable)

Statement12345
I received high-quality research advising and mentorship.
My advisor/committee provided timely feedback on my work.

Section 5: Career Outcomes & Readiness

Please rate each skill area using the following 4-point scale: (1 = Not at all, 2 = Somewhat, 3 = A moderate amount, 4 = A great deal)

Skill AreaNot at allSomewhatA moderate amountA great deal
Research Skills
Teaching Skills
Communication Skills
Networking Skills
Leadership Skills
Project Management Skills
Career Planning and Job Search Skills

Section 6: Program Evaluation and Open Feedback

Please rate your level of agreement (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree)

Statement12345
My expectations going into the program were met
I would recommend this program to other prospective students

Example Analytics

WSU PhD Exit Survey Analytics Dashboard
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY

PhD Exit Survey Analytics Dashboard

Graduate School | Real-time insights from graduating doctoral students | Academic Year 2024-2025

247 responses
Total Responses
247
Completion Rate
89%
Secured Employment
67%
Avg. Time to Degree
5.4yrs
Would Recommend
82%
📊 SECTION 1: FUNDING & SUPPORT
Anticipated Institutional Support
Key Insight: 76% of students anticipated continuous institutional support, but only 58% received it throughout their program.
Expected Years of Funding
Key Insight: Most students (42%) anticipated 5 years of support, but average actual support was 3.8 years.
Graduate Assistantship Experience
Outside Employment During PhD
Non-Institutional Funding Sources (Average Years)
Key Insight: 64% of students relied on student loans for an average of 2.3 years. Outside employment (1.8 years avg) and personal/family support (1.5 years avg) were also significant funding sources.
📚 SECTION 2: RESEARCH & PUBLICATIONS
Publication Output
Key Insight: Average of 2.4 peer-reviewed publications per graduate, with 1.2 additional manuscripts under review.
Other Scholarly Contributions
💼 SECTION 3: CAREER DEVELOPMENT
Teaching Assistant Experience Value
Research Assistant Experience Value
Staff Assistant Experience Value
Internship/Externship Participation
🎯 SECTION 4: PROGRAM SATISFACTION
Program Satisfaction Metrics (1-5 Scale)
Expectations Met
Would Recommend Program
🚀 SECTION 5: CAREER OUTCOMES
Post-Graduation Employment Plans
Key Insight: 67% have secured positions, 23% are actively seeking, 6% not seeking, and 4% unsure. This represents a strong placement rate.
First Job Placement by Category (Secured Positions Only)
Employment Status Details
Employment Category Count Percentage Avg. Salary Range Status
Academic Faculty 52 21% $65,000 – $75,000 Secured
Postdoctoral Position 38 15% $48,000 – $55,000 Secured
Industry R&D 35 14% $85,000 – $110,000 Secured
Government Research 18 7% $70,000 – $85,000 Secured
Industry Management 15 6% $95,000 – $125,000 Secured
Academic Research (Non-Faculty) 8 3% $55,000 – $70,000 Secured
Actively Seeking 57 23% Seeking
Not Seeking 15 6% Not Seeking
Unsure 9 4% Undecided
Skill Development Through Doctoral Training (1-4 Scale)
Key Insight: Research skills showed strongest development (avg 3.7/4.0), while career planning skills scored lowest (avg 2.4/4.0), indicating an area for program improvement.
💰 SECTION 6: FINANCIAL IMPACT & TIME TO DEGREE
Financial Impact on Degree Progress
Key Insight: 48% reported finances negatively impacted their progress, correlating with extended time-to-degree.
Time to Degree Distribution
Factors Affecting Timely Completion (Impact Rating 1-5)